How to Write a Compensation Philosophy: Complete Guide
Step-by-step guide with principles, formatting, and sharing best practices.

A compensation philosophy is the backbone of a fair, consistent, and credible rewards strategy. It explains how your company makes pay decisions, why those choices are made, and how they connect to culture, performance, and growth.
In this article, we will review the different steps to build a compensation philosophy that makes sense for your typology of company.
What is a compensation philosophy?
A compensation philosophy is the set of principles and rules your company uses to decide how people are paid, rewarded, and recognized. It explains how you approach salary, bonuses, equity, benefits, and progression, and why.
Usually, this philosophy is defined by leadership together with HR or rewards teams, then captured in a document that can be shared internally at the level of detail that fits your culture. When done well, it gives managers a clear decision framework and helps employees understand the “why” behind their pay, even when they do not fully agree with every individual decision.
Why a compensation philosophy matters
A well-structured philosophy is not just a policy document; it is a strategic tool. It helps your company to:
- Set clear expectations about how pay is determined and reviewed.
- Simplify and standardize compensation decisions as you scale.
- Reduce bias and support fair, explainable, and equitable pay practices.
- Provide a common foundation across teams, locations, and business units.
- Strengthen your employer brand and employee experience by building trust.
Rewarding performance, preparing managers for compensation discussions, and helping employees understand how growth translates into pay all become easier when the underlying philosophy is explicit.
Formatting your philosophy
There is no single “correct” format; the best structure depends on your size, culture, and level of transparency. However, most organizations benefit from a two-layer approach.
Short statement and guiding principles
This is a concise, high-level summary that expresses how you think about pay. It should be easy to share, easy to remember, and clearly aligned with your values.
For example, a company might commit to:
- Paying competitively for role, location, and level.
- Rewarding performance and impact, not just tenure.
- Maintaining internal equity within comparable roles.
- Being transparent about how decisions are made, even if individual pay is not disclosed.
This short statement becomes the “front door” to your philosophy and can be used in onboarding, manager training, and employer branding.
Below an example of GitLab’s principles:
We're an open organization, and we want to be as transparent as possible about our compensation principles. Our compensation model is open to data driven iterations. […] Compensation aims to be at a competitive rate for your job family, your location, your level, your experience, and your contract type. […] We do not disclose individual compensation since compensation is not public.
Another example from Delta Airlines focused on performance-based pay:
Our overarching compensation philosophy is to provide industry-leading total compensation for industry-leading performance across all workgroups.
Pay for performance is the foundation of our compensation philosophy for all employees, driving a strong sense of team work and continual improvement of business results.
Keeping these statements short allows to provide a first high-level vision that managers and employees can own, while keeping more detailed information available to people that want or need more precision.
Detailed handbook or playbook
Behind the principles sits a more complete document that explains:
- How market data is used.
- Who approves what.
- How salary reviews, promotions, bonuses, and equity are handled.
- How exceptions are managed.
This handbook can be a living resource for HR, leadership, managers, and eventually all employees, depending on your transparency model.
Again, GitLab’s Total Rewards handbook provides detailed paragraphs to explain their market-based approach, the internal organization that deals with compensation approvals, rules and criteria regarding compensation items and extensive documentation on their increase compensation cycles.
Key topics to cover in your compensation philosophy
o make your philosophy actionable, include clear answers to questions like:
- Core principles
What do you optimize for? Internal equity, market competitiveness, performance differentiation, pay transparency, or a mix of these? - Market position
Which market(s) do you benchmark against (by role, country, or industry)? Do you aim to pay at the median, below, or above market—and for which components (salary, total cash, total compensation)? - Compensation ranges and leveling
How do you define and refresh ranges?- What data sources are used?
- How do you create peer groups and job levels?
- How often are ranges reviewed and updated?
- Offer and adjustment rules
How do you decide starting pay for candidates?
Which factors are considered for increases: performance, job level, internal parity, location, skills scarcity, or tenure? - Compensation review cycles
How often do you run salary reviews and bonus rounds?
Who is eligible, and under what conditions?
What recommendations or matrices guide managers? - Promotions and career progression
What constitutes a promotion versus a role change?
How do promotions link to pay changes and to ranges at the next level? - Variable pay (bonuses, incentives, equity)
Which roles are eligible for variable pay?
How are targets set, measured, and paid out?
How do you balance individual, team, and company performance? - Benefits and total rewards
How do benefits (health, retirement, leave, flexibility, wellness, etc.) fit into your overall philosophy?
What trade-offs do you make between cash and non-cash rewards?
Throughout, explicitly connect these choices to your culture and stage (early-stage startup vs. mature company, remote vs. office-centric, global vs. local, and so on).
Be sure to include how these compensation practices are linked to your culture, your values and add specific company context when relevant to emphasize your points.
Sharing your compensation philosophy
Defining your philosophy is only half the work; the other half is communication and adoption.
You can decide how deeply to share it depending on your transparency level and company maturity:
- At a minimum, share the high-level statement and principles with all employees.
- Over time, expand access to more detailed sections, FAQs, and examples.
- Use your intranet, handbook, or a compensation platform so the information is centralized and easy to find.
Manager enablement is crucial. Train managers to:
- Explain how the philosophy applies to their team.
- Have structured conversations about pay, growth, and expectations.
- Handle questions about fairness, market data, and ranges.
Evolving with your company
A compensation philosophy is not meant to be static. As your company grows, enters new markets, changes strategy, or revises its values, your approach to pay should evolve as well.
Set a regular cadence (for example, annually or after major strategic shifts) to review:
- Whether your principles still reflect reality and aspirations.
- Whether your market position is still appropriate.
- Whether your processes are delivering fairness, clarity, and competitiveness.
When thoughtfully designed and actively maintained, a compensation philosophy becomes a core pillar of your retention and attraction strategy. It creates clarity, reduces noise, and provides a stable foundation for thousands of individual pay decisions over time.



